case when law is silent Things To Know Before You Buy
case when law is silent Things To Know Before You Buy
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Case legislation is specific into the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. By way of example, a ruling within a California appellate court would not commonly be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
As being the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be reached, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) on the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
The ruling of your first court created case law that must be followed by other courts right until or Unless of course both new legislation is created, or maybe a higher court rules differently.
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. In addition they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi models, with non-compliance going through departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, They're directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. twelve. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
Since the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been reached, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
PLR is usually a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
When you find an error from the information of the published opinion (such as a misspelled name or a grammatical error), please notify the Reporter click here of Decisions. TVW
Some bodies are offered statutory powers to issue steering with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway Code.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle set up by a court, which other courts are obligated to adhere to.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative with the legislation laid down because of the Supreme Court in the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Therefore, the competent authority in the parent department from the petitioner plus the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount with the petitioner and shell out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits into the petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority from the respondent can be directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits on the petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
ten. Based to the findings from the inquiry committee, this petition is not deemed maintainable and it is therefore liable to get dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
seventeen . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have listened to the uncovered counsel with the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as the issues with the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession from the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court should see this facet for interim custody of the topic premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners may well look for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more